funq Discussions Rss Feed

New Post: Problem building from source

lencharest — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:18:43 GMT

Building Funq.sln from changeset a6b122a40ab2 in VS 2010 fails with errors in Funq.Tests. That is, Funq.dll builds fine, but the tests do not.

Is building inside VS supported? If so, is there something I need to set in the environment to get Funq.tests to build?

The build errors all relate to Funq.Tests not having visibility into the internal objects of Funq. It appears that the InternalsVisibleTo attributes in src\Core\Funq\Properties\InternalsVisibleTo.cs are not having the desired effect.

I was able to get Funq.Tests to build by turning off code-signing and removing the PublicKey data from the InternalsVisibleTo attributes. While this approach works in the sense that I can now run the supplied tests, I would prefer to avoid having to modify the source in order to build the full solution.

New Post: Project is dead?

F0rc0sigan — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:51:18 GMT

Hi all,

I am wondering will this project continue developed?

which application it was made for?Is it survive in production(I talk about web production)?

What can you say about similar project http://munq.codeplex.com/?Is it faster or better?

New Post: Rebind possible

dcazzulino — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:02:27 GMT

thanks!~

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:59, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

As usual you are the man!

Am 04.01.2011 um 20:50 schrieb "dcazzulino"<notifications@codeplex.com>:

From: dcazzulino

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

LOBOMINATOR — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:58:57 GMT

As usual you are the man!

Am 04.01.2011 um 20:50 schrieb "dcazzulino"<notifications@codeplex.com>:

From: dcazzulino

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

dcazzulino — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:50:47 GMT

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

LOBOMINATOR — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:06:28 GMT

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:03:08 GMT

Sorry, in the samples I only found the "Performance" sample... which sample are you referring to?

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:31:34 GMT

OK, I'll have a look at the sample code.

I was exactly planning to use it with WP7, to avoid all the reflection that might slow the WP7 app a bit too much

Thx

Simone

New Post: Status of the project

dcazzulino — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:38:55 GMT

There is a sample in the source code that shows funqlets. They basically configure a container for you.

This is production quality. It's the IoC used by the p&p guidance on building WP7 apps, for example.

There is a new feature coming which will do the automatic registrations based on MEF Import/Export attributes, at *built-time*, so that it continues to be blazingly fast at runtime for mobile use (or desktop/server).

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:31:58 GMT

Hi all,

I'm wondering which is the status of the project.

I saw there was a 1.0 release in October, but I have seen very little going on in this discussion group.

Also I don't understand if this is just a PoC or a really production-grade IoC container: I can't find any documentation on how to used it beside the basic features:

Container container = new Container();
container.Register<IClimbingTools>(c => new QuickDraws());
container.Register(c => new Climber(c.Resolve<IClimbingTools>()));
var climber = container.Resolve<Climber>();

Is there something else I am missing? Most IoC container have features to select dependencies based on conditions: in Funq do we have to define all these conditions ourselves in the factory parameter of the Register method?

In the intellisense I found a IFunqlet interface, but I didn't find any method that accept is a parameter: my understanding is that the Funqlet should contain the "configuration" of a specific module of your app (like a Module in Ninject), but how do I provide it to the container?

Thank you

Simone

New Post: Problem with repository?

daniel_lidstrom — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:10:08 GMT

Hi,

I'm trying to clone the repository but there seems to be some problem with it:

C:\Users\Daniel\Programming>hg clone https://hg01.codeplex.com/funq

destination directory: funq

requesting all changes

adding changesets

adding manifests

adding file changes

transaction abort!

rollback completed

abort: premature EOF reading chunk (got 175602 bytes, expected 236444)

New Post: Determine if a Type/Name has been Registered

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:14:08 GMT

no worries :)

we're going with support for WP7 :)

New Post: Determine if a Type/Name has been Registered

mabster — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:23:30 GMT

Ugh. Looks like it disappeared when Funq switched from svn to hg - there used to be a "patches" link under Source Code where you could find it. I've long since migrated to Autofac so I don't know if I have the patch anymore either. I will check when I'm back at work in a few weeks.

New Post: Dispose problem if Owner == Container and ReuseScope == None

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:44:21 GMT

if your object holds on to unmanaged resources and really needs disposable, you should implement the finalizable pattern and that would cover this scenario perfectly.

if funq kept those references just to dispose them later on, they would never die, and for a global factory container that would mean infinite memory leak.

New Post: How do I register a generic service?

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:40:38 GMT

Logdog: I'm releasing v1 of funq finally very soon. It will support WP7 development too.

.NET CF isn't even supported in VS2010, so I don't even know how I'm gonna ship binaries for that :S

New Post: IContainer

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:38:42 GMT

This discussion has been copied to a work item. Click here to go to the work item and continue the discussion.

New Post: Handling Dispose

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:32:20 GMT

yes and NO, I meant ;)

New Post: Handling Dispose

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:32:10 GMT

yes and now :)

The comment in Container.cs says:

		// Disposable components include factory-scoped instances that we don't keep 
		// a strong reference to.

And that's the key. We also track disposables that have no reuse, and which we therefore don't keep track of in the services.values.

New Post: Determine if a Type/Name has been Registered

dcazzulino — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:21:20 GMT

where did this patch go, in the end? can't find it here, or in my emails :((((

New Post: Property Injection

dcazzulino — Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:04:42 GMT

precisely :)