Funq: a fast DI container you can understand

Created Issue: NuGet package [2162]

richard_szalay — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:49:05 GMT

Any chance we could see a NuGet package for Funq? I really like to avoid committing assemblies to version control where possible.

Commented Issue: Corrupt hg repository with fix instructions [2161]

yeurch — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:25:30 GMT

I have no clue if Codeplex mundged this up or if something else is a problem but I wanted to give my fix steps for correcting the repository corruption I seem to be getting 100% of the time.

First is cloning this properly. Be sure to use the advanced clone option called "Use uncompressed transfer". The end result is a repo set at revision -1.

Fix #1 - revision 3
1) Clone a separate instance to revision 2. I called this funq.fixed.
2) Download the Silverlight Toolkit December 2008 from here http://silverlight.codeplex.com/releases/view/19172#DownloadId=51431.
3) Add Microsoft.Silverlight.Testing.dll and Microsoft.VisualStudio.QualityTools.UnitTesting.Silverlight.dll. to the the directory src\Lib\Silverlight UT. Commit.
4) Now the fun part. Go into the hg directory .hg\store\data\src\_lib\_silverlight _u_t\ and look for _microsoft._silverlight._testing.dll.i. Copy this to the main funq repository in the exact same location.
5) Edit .hg\store\fncache and the line data/src/Lib/Silverlight UT/Microsoft.Silverlight.Testing.dll.i (I did mine underneath the existing entry for *Testing.dll.d)
6) Update to revision 53 to prepare for fix #2

Fix #2 - Revision 54
1) Clone a copy of the fixed main repository up to revision 53 in a separate directory called funq.fixed2.
2) Update Microsoft.Silverlight.Testing.dll from the April 2010 Silverlight Toolkit in src\Lib\Silverlight UT. Commit.
3) Go into the hg directory .hg\store\data\src\_lib\_silverlight _u_t\ and this time grab both _microsoft._silverlight._testing.dll.d and _microsoft._silverlight._testing.dll.i (the only difference is the .i and .d on the end) and paste BOTH FILES back to the same location in the main repository
4) Now update to revision 54 and then to the latest revision and you should be set. I had to do this due to some file mismatches.

This only matters for those of us that wish to fix their local repository. Going forward I should be able to see any updates. If you'd like, I can send you my repository if somehow your local version is corrupt. Unfortunately I don't think codeplex can be fixed as easily but perhaps with these steps we could help them out?
Comments: Amazing fix @w0rddriven, thanks! As Arthur C. Clarke said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." This desperately needs fixing in the Codeplex repo. Gets my vote.

Reviewed: Funq 1.0 (дек 23, 2011)

andrew_khmylov — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:39:16 GMT

Rated 5 Stars (out of 5) - I find Funq very helpful for my WP7 projects.

Created Issue: Corrupt hg repository with fix instructions [2161]

w0rddriven — Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:53:46 GMT

New Comment on "Getting Started"

IuriiO — Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:51:21 GMT

Looking forward to Getting Started Guide! Thanks!

Source code checked in, #643423d8435e

dcazzulino — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:34:54 GMT

Advanced the Funqlet nuget, improved folder organization, etc.

Updated Wiki: Home

dcazzulino — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:58:49 GMT

Project Description
This project provides a high performance DI framework by eliminating all runtime reflection through the use of lambdas and generic functions as factories.

Developed entirely in C# using TDD, it's a container you can crack open and actually understand to the core.

To follow the entire process of creating Funq applying test-driven development, make sure you watch the Funq Screencast Series

Read the Getting Started guide.

The initial version, for the CF, was created for the Mobile Application Blocks.

New Post: Problem building from source

lencharest — Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:18:43 GMT

Building Funq.sln from changeset a6b122a40ab2 in VS 2010 fails with errors in Funq.Tests. That is, Funq.dll builds fine, but the tests do not.

Is building inside VS supported? If so, is there something I need to set in the environment to get Funq.tests to build?

The build errors all relate to Funq.Tests not having visibility into the internal objects of Funq. It appears that the InternalsVisibleTo attributes in src\Core\Funq\Properties\InternalsVisibleTo.cs are not having the desired effect.

I was able to get Funq.Tests to build by turning off code-signing and removing the PublicKey data from the InternalsVisibleTo attributes. While this approach works in the sense that I can now run the supplied tests, I would prefer to avoid having to modify the source in order to build the full solution.

New Post: Project is dead?

F0rc0sigan — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 13:51:18 GMT

Hi all,

I am wondering will this project continue developed?

which application it was made for?Is it survive in production(I talk about web production)?

What can you say about similar project http://munq.codeplex.com/?Is it faster or better?

Reviewed: Funq 1.0 (Jan 20, 2011)

mjennings80 — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:08:09 GMT

Rated 5 Stars (out of 5) - Thank you!

New Post: Rebind possible

dcazzulino — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:02:27 GMT

thanks!~

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:59, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

As usual you are the man!

Am 04.01.2011 um 20:50 schrieb "dcazzulino"<notifications@codeplex.com>:

From: dcazzulino

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

LOBOMINATOR — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:58:57 GMT

As usual you are the man!

Am 04.01.2011 um 20:50 schrieb "dcazzulino"<notifications@codeplex.com>:

From: dcazzulino

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

dcazzulino — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:50:47 GMT

absolutely. The latest registration wins. So you can just overwrite the previous registration.

/kzu

--
Daniel Cazzulino | Developer Lead | MS MVP | Clarius Consulting | +1 425.329.3471

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 16:06, LOBOMINATOR <notifications@codeplex.com> wrote:

From: LOBOMINATOR

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

Read the full discussion online.

To add a post to this discussion, reply to this email (funq@discussions.codeplex.com)

To start a new discussion for this project, email funq@discussions.codeplex.com

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this discussion on CodePlex. You can unsubscribe or change your settings on codePlex.com.

Please note: Images and attachments will be removed from emails. Any posts to this discussion will also be available online at codeplex.com

New Post: Rebind possible

LOBOMINATOR — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:06:28 GMT

Hello,

For acceptance tests it would be very cool to just rebind certain types to a mock for example. This would mean I would use the standard defined resolution tree defined in the container but for certain dependencies I would like to rebind a certain registration. Is this possible?

Daniel

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:03:08 GMT

Sorry, in the samples I only found the "Performance" sample... which sample are you referring to?

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 14:31:34 GMT

OK, I'll have a look at the sample code.

I was exactly planning to use it with WP7, to avoid all the reflection that might slow the WP7 app a bit too much

Thx

Simone

New Post: Status of the project

dcazzulino — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:38:55 GMT

There is a sample in the source code that shows funqlets. They basically configure a container for you.

This is production quality. It's the IoC used by the p&p guidance on building WP7 apps, for example.

There is a new feature coming which will do the automatic registrations based on MEF Import/Export attributes, at *built-time*, so that it continues to be blazingly fast at runtime for mobile use (or desktop/server).

New Post: Status of the project

simonech — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:31:58 GMT

Hi all,

I'm wondering which is the status of the project.

I saw there was a 1.0 release in October, but I have seen very little going on in this discussion group.

Also I don't understand if this is just a PoC or a really production-grade IoC container: I can't find any documentation on how to used it beside the basic features:

Container container = new Container();
container.Register<IClimbingTools>(c => new QuickDraws());
container.Register(c => new Climber(c.Resolve<IClimbingTools>()));
var climber = container.Resolve<Climber>();

Is there something else I am missing? Most IoC container have features to select dependencies based on conditions: in Funq do we have to define all these conditions ourselves in the factory parameter of the Register method?

In the intellisense I found a IFunqlet interface, but I didn't find any method that accept is a parameter: my understanding is that the Funqlet should contain the "configuration" of a specific module of your app (like a Module in Ninject), but how do I provide it to the container?

Thank you

Simone

New Post: Problem with repository?

daniel_lidstrom — Fri, 03 Dec 2010 08:10:08 GMT

Hi,

I'm trying to clone the repository but there seems to be some problem with it:

C:\Users\Daniel\Programming>hg clone https://hg01.codeplex.com/funq

destination directory: funq

requesting all changes

adding changesets

adding manifests

adding file changes

transaction abort!

rollback completed

abort: premature EOF reading chunk (got 175602 bytes, expected 236444)

Source code checked in, #a6b122a40ab2

dcazzulino — Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:38:53 GMT

Updated build script for msbuild funqlet support.